3 ms·
You mean the chemical weapons confirmed by both the NYT and the international Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons? https://www.nytimes.com/201
by throw10920 4y ago
You mean the chemical weapons confirmed by both the NYT and the international Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons?
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/world/middleeast/questions-answers-abandoned-chemical-weapons-in-iraq.html https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/24/world/middleeast/question...
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/23/world/middleeast/thousands-of-iraq-chemical-weapons-destroyed-in-open-air-watchdog-says-.html https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/23/world/middleeast/thousand...
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/world/cia-is-said-to-have-bought-and-destroyed-iraqi-chemical-weapons.html https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/16/world/cia-is-said-to-have...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/12/03/world/middleeast/chemical-weapons-iraq-pentagon-secrets.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/12/03/world/middlee...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middlee...
- buchoo 4y agoGP presumably meant the weapons of mass destruction Donald Rumsfeld claimed Saddam Hussein was developing in "seeking the means to strike the United States and our friends and allies",[0] not unusable pre-1991 weapons that were rusting or buried in the desert. [0] https://www.americanprogress.org/article/in-their-own-words-iraqs-imminent-threat/ https://www.americanprogress.org/article/in-their-own-words-...
- ConstantVigil 4y agoThis, thanks.
- ConstantVigil 4y ago[flagged]