3 ms·
The "nothingburger" you quoted is a single word you took from a reply chain in which amedvednikov explained the 800 byte "memory leak" was actually just GC over
by hunterb123 4y ago
The "nothingburger" you quoted is a single word you took from a reply chain in which amedvednikov explained the 800 byte "memory leak" was actually just GC overhead and expected.
So it wasn't a memory leak, it is GC overhead, hence it being labeled as a "nothingburger".
What specifically do you feel hasn't been resolved or addressed properly?
- bragr 4y ago>What specifically do you feel hasn't been resolved or addressed properly? The author responding constructively to criticism. The bugs may be fixed, but if the author can't calmly engage and link to the fixed commit, or give evidence that, for example, everything compiled with GCC leaks those 800 bytes, well that's a major red flag about the project management of V.