3 ms·

Yeah, please be specific. I've received so many vague accusations like this, and never ever were any actual examples given.

bragr 4y ago
Unsupported ad hominem against the person and technical assertions without any evidence: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946432 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946432 Unsupported conspiratorial assertions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946840 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946840 You know what the common thread in all the problems and issues you identify in this post? You communicating poorly: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946635 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946635 This is not a constructive way to engage with someone, even if they are spamming: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945932 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945932 I'm not even sure what to say about thread, you got all hostile on someone who was basically on your side because the blogs post you hate made him think something that you yourself agree with which that V is not production ready? This person might have come back to check out your 1.0, but I doubt they will now! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31930435 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31930435 And just the level of cognitive dissidence here. Why are you mad about someone calling your 0.3 not production ready software immature? It's interesting how you can call the language immature without even trying it. 0.3 pretty clearly means it's not production ready software. I'm not even that far back in your comment history. That's all the free emotional labor I'm willing to do for you today. Edit: Also I don't want to be the tone police, but I stepped past a lot of comments that seemed to run afoul of the "it's not what you said it's the way you said it" rule. My last piece of advice would be to read through your comments and ask yourself if the tone of them is best for achieving your (I presume) goal of promoting V.
- amedvednikov 4y ago
  Without any evidence? Really? Here's the account I was talking about: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=vlang1dot0 https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=vlang1dot0 Everything else can be found in the "V is scam" articles. There will be a big article by me covering all that. "Immature" != "not ready for production". Regarding that immaturity comment, here's a good summary by someone else from this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945442 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945442
  - bragr 4y ago
    One troll does not prove everything else is a conspiracy. >"Immature" != "not ready for production". What? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/immature https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/immature
    - amedvednikov 4y ago
      It takes a lot more than one troll to mass flag a post 3 times within a day.

bragr 4y ago

Unsupported ad hominem against the person and technical assertions without any evidence: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946432 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946432 Unsupported conspiratorial assertions: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946840 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946840 You know what the common thread in all the problems and issues you identify in this post? You communicating poorly: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946635 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31946635 This is not a constructive way to engage with someone, even if they are spamming: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945932 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945932 I'm not even sure what to say about thread, you got all hostile on someone who was basically on your side because the blogs post you hate made him think something that you yourself agree with which that V is not production ready? This person might have come back to check out your 1.0, but I doubt they will now! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31930435 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31930435 And just the level of cognitive dissidence here. Why are you mad about someone calling your 0.3 not production ready software immature? It's interesting how you can call the language immature without even trying it. 0.3 pretty clearly means it's not production ready software. I'm not even that far back in your comment history. That's all the free emotional labor I'm willing to do for you today. Edit: Also I don't want to be the tone police, but I stepped past a lot of comments that seemed to run afoul of the "it's not what you said it's the way you said it" rule. My last piece of advice would be to read through your comments and ask yourself if the tone of them is best for achieving your (I presume) goal of promoting V.

amedvednikov 4y ago
Without any evidence? Really? Here's the account I was talking about: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=vlang1dot0 https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=vlang1dot0 Everything else can be found in the "V is scam" articles. There will be a big article by me covering all that. "Immature" != "not ready for production". Regarding that immaturity comment, here's a good summary by someone else from this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945442 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31945442
- bragr 4y ago
  One troll does not prove everything else is a conspiracy. >"Immature" != "not ready for production". What? https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/immature https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/immature
  - amedvednikov 4y ago
    It takes a lot more than one troll to mass flag a post 3 times within a day.