The article sounded more like whining because the author does not like the present currents of thought in Harvard and elsewhere in the academia. I'm not intima

The article sounded more like whining because the author does not like the present currents of thought in Harvard and elsewhere in the academia. I'm not intimate with Roland Fryer or his research, but the phrase the author chose to quote from him ("no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account") does make him seem like an apologist of racial oppression. Not to mention the closing quote (by the author) "truth is the first casualty of progressivism". Harvard may need to fall, but for completely different reasons.