> you restate a summary of the argument in your own words and in good faith, bolstering it or lending structure where needed [...] Then the person has a chance

> you restate a summary of the argument in your own words and in good faith, bolstering it or lending structure where needed [...] Then the person has a chance to correct you. Where are y'all seeing these debates actually happen? I always assumed steelmanning was a process you conduct entirely in your mind, while deciding your opinion or writing your editorial.