Let me provide you with a counter-example. Suppose that there's a law that states that water and access to it is always supposed to remain public, because wate

Let me provide you with a counter-example. Suppose that there's a law that states that water and access to it is always supposed to remain public, because water is a public good. Suppose that someone comes tomorrow and starts claiming ownership of all the water springs in your country, he becomes the only entry point to get water, and you have to pay him a fee every time you open a tap. Is he still free to do so? In other words, is the freedom of someone who restrict the freedoms for everyone else still a form of freedom that is worth even considering, let alone respecting? Because the foundation of your ideas is exactly the reason why capitalism fucked things up and just let a bunch of jerks get rich without merit.