> If people aren't able to get out of poverty because the job never existed in the first place, are they really better off? i think this is a false dichotomy:

> If people aren't able to get out of poverty because the job never existed in the first place, are they really better off? i think this is a false dichotomy: there is no universal law that says people in poverty must put up with abuse, slave wages and unsafe work environments in order to dig themselves out