Considering the popularity of git itself and the fact it is successfully taught at bootcamps and university at a satisfactory level, I would disagree that being

Considering the popularity of git itself and the fact it is successfully taught at bootcamps and university at a satisfactory level, I would disagree that being a “deep tool” is part of the reason it’s not 100% ubiquitous. The easy parts are still very accessible to newcomers and the existence of deep part doesn’t negate that. And I also take issue with calling its “non-100% ubiquity” a problem. There is plenty of space for other tools. If anything, there’s almost a “git monopoly”. Sure it could improve in parts, but the general discussion here doesn’t seem to be focused on improvements at all…