4 ms·
Yes. But I'm under the impression the core issue is GH charging $10 p/m for CoP, not CoP itself. That is, taking what should be free and adding a price tag. Or
by chiefalchemist 4y ago
Yes. But I'm under the impression the core issue is GH charging $10 p/m for CoP, not CoP itself. That is, taking what should be free and adding a price tag.
Or maybe I've misread the article?
- nine_k 4y agoCharging money for GPL'd software is explicitly allowed [1]. I suppose this is how e.g. Red Hat operates. [1]: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
- chiefalchemist 4y agoSo then what exactly is the article objecting to? Sorry, I musta missed something.
- nine_k 4y agoThe article does not; the comment I answered to, yes.