You don't need a human to even look at it until after an "AI" has already flagged it as "something fishy" worthy of human attention, and even then the font don'

You don't need a human to even look at it until after an "AI" has already flagged it as "something fishy" worthy of human attention, and even then the font don't matter so much, because you'd be using some fancy scripting or tools to be pointing out to the user what exactly is potentially "fishy" about it. Seemingly insurmountable task becomes common "drudge-work" with the aid of some cleverly scripted tools. It's actually what computers are good at. Automating and simplifying repetitive tasks over large data sets. Something that Google's people should be well aware of and able to fairly easily implement. You could even script the tools such that the humans tasked with checking on the flagged materials would be helping further the training of the AI through their responses to the individual situations for less false positives, and more accurate flagging going forward, making the humans' jobs easier as they continue to do it.