3 ms·
That means you're now selecting for all the spammers that are somehow evading the eyes of that crew. It doesn't matter whether they are doing it intentionally i
by MauranKilom 4y ago
That means you're now selecting for all the spammers that are somehow evading the eyes of that crew. It doesn't matter whether they are doing it intentionally initially, this un-natural selection will inevitably lead to spammers figuring out how to not be seen by those Google people.
- jfoster 4y agoIt sounds like you're assuming that Google sticks to a single approach and doesn't waver from it, despite spam still being present. They wouldn't do it like that, though, would they?
- MauranKilom 4y agoThe point is more that, unless Google keeps continuously expanding their approach along every dimension, whichever spammers happen to be evading them at any given point will stick around and multiply.
- jfoster 4y agoThe thing about spam is that as it becomes more evasive, it's also less clear for the humans it was intended for. Once they raise the bar high enough, the spam will be gone.
- iforgotpassword 4y agoBut what are you suggesting then? Not even trying and accepting the fate of YouTube drowning in spam? Keep chasing the dream of the perfect spam fighting AI that's been just around the corner for the last 5 years? Incidentally LTT just commented on the announced changes and rants about the prior situation at 15:20, for some insight from a Creator's perspective. https://youtu.be/hf5N2UVGp-8 https://youtu.be/hf5N2UVGp-8