3 ms·
It may be useful in that if even step one is a no go, at least you’ll find out early that discussion is useless and you can spend your time in others ways I us
by wussboy 4y ago
It may be useful in that if even step one is a no go, at least you’ll find out early that discussion is useless and you can spend your time in others ways
I used to argue religion on Facebook a lot (I know, I know). But I stopped accepting invitations to debate when I started asked my opponents to agree before hand that they would agree to change their minds if I was right (as I agreed to change if I was wrong). When I realized they weren’t interested in learning anything, the point of debate went away.
- akavel 4y agoWho was to be the arbiter in the debate, i.e. the person deciding which one of you were right?