3 ms·
Wow, the person who wrote that text has some talent for bureaucratese. It's comparatively rare to see that in English, since the language tends toward clear ver
by aasasd 4y ago
Wow, the person who wrote that text has some talent for bureaucratese. It's comparatively rare to see that in English, since the language tends toward clear verbs and the active voice. But here I had to re-read a bunch of sentences to figure out what refers to what, while wondering if I need to take a coffee break. I would say that the author probably moonlights as a writer for NYT or something—if the dryness of the document wasn't quite outstanding, beyond what is still considered fit for consumption.
- IceHegel 4y ago> It is not questioned that any single DID method might fail to achieve one or more of these properties. The consideration here is whether the proposed DID identifier syntax and associated mechanisms has been sufficiently shown to have defined an extensible class of identifiers that has these properties. This paragraph gave me temporary brain fog. I think it's saying that so long as the proposed syntax is flexible enough that one or more DID methods can satisfy... and then I'm lost again.
- quickthrower2 4y agoMaybe like saying any HTML element alone can’t build you say… Slack, but with a bunch of them you can. Tldr: it is lego?