The objections by Mozilla & Google make sense if you assume by denying their requests that the methods should be define prior to moving forward, but to me, the

The objections by Mozilla & Google make sense if you assume by denying their requests that the methods should be define prior to moving forward, but to me, the core as defined is more than enough to move forward and the next step is to define the methods. Worst case, the core is flawed and the specs are revised to align to what has been learned flushing out the methods or it is abandoned for whatever reason. Mozilla & Google saying they object based on everything not being defined sounds like the opposite of progress to me. The core already lays out specs for methods and clearly they’re good enough for other workgroups to already be moving forward refining methods for specific use cases. Here’s an example: https://identity.foundation/peer-did-method-spec/ https://identity.foundation/peer-did-method-spec/ If there’s an significant issue with moving forward, I am not understanding it.