4 ms·
> there's a danger to Originalism, in that people in the past didn't have the information Good thing they built in a mechanism for revision then. Their intent
by kryogen1c 4y ago
> there's a danger to Originalism, in that people in the past didn't have the information
Good thing they built in a mechanism for revision then.
Their intent is relatively clear. If you don't like the rule, change the rule. Anything else is vigilantism.
- WesternWind 4y agoIt's bold to suggest their intent is relatively clear when the Court is literally reversing it's past standard in this case and many others this term.