It's fair to point out problems in the general project and philosophy, but I think that's a different conversation. The discussion at hand points to general com

It's fair to point out problems in the general project and philosophy, but I think that's a different conversation. The discussion at hand points to general compatibility problems that have never been promised. Even if Wayland had been a different project with the properties you desire (which at face value seem fair enough), that still wouldn't have delivered anything like the strawman 1:1 Xorg compatibility this blog talks about, nor would it likely have overcome the general messiness and lack of direction on the Linux desktop that's keeping both X11 and non-X11 desktops back.