3 ms·
> That could be a teaching moment. Given the context of this thread, comments like these are part of the reasons teams don't use Git. One probably needs 10x s
by BeetleB 4y ago
> That could be a teaching moment.
Given the context of this thread, comments like these are part of the reasons teams don't use Git.
One probably needs 10x such teaching moments with Git compared to other VCs - including good DVCS.
- ratww 4y agoConsidering the popularity of git itself and the fact it is successfully taught at bootcamps and university at a satisfactory level, I would disagree that being a “deep tool” is part of the reason it’s not 100% ubiquitous. The easy parts are still very accessible to newcomers and the existence of deep part doesn’t negate that. And I also take issue with calling its “non-100% ubiquity” a problem. There is plenty of space for other tools. If anything, there’s almost a “git monopoly”. Sure it could improve in parts, but the general discussion here doesn’t seem to be focused on improvements at all…