Which is of course odd since it flies directly in the face of Scalia's "originalism", and lays bare that the constitution is a living document. It also means th

Which is of course odd since it flies directly in the face of Scalia's "originalism", and lays bare that the constitution is a living document. It also means that by the very act of objecting to the ruling, I am creating precedent to repeal, since I am "creating controversy".