2 ms·
First stop adding to the problem. Then, reduce the problem. Diverting resources to capture would steal from displacing CO2 emitters. There is no way you can ca
by ncmncm 4y ago
First stop adding to the problem. Then, reduce the problem.
Diverting resources to capture would steal from displacing CO2 emitters. There is no way you can capture more than is being emitted until the amount emitted is driven way, way down. Only after you cannot displace much output anymore are other methods of any use.
You get overwhelmingly more benefit from each dollar by displacing output.
- boxed 4y agoYour fallacy is assuming resources are diverted. When you buy candy, are you diverting resources away from cutting CO2 emissions? When you buy a movie ticket? Every month when you pay your Netflix subscription? We can do both. In fact we MUST do both.