4 ms·
No idea at that point. If the code had a license that forbid reupload you could ask GitHub to remove it. Otherwise that's the price of open source, you don't
by bioemerl 4y ago
No idea at that point. If the code had a license that forbid reupload you could ask GitHub to remove it.
Otherwise that's the price of open source, you don't get to choose.
- account42 4y agoYou do get to choose what license you release under and people need to respect that license - ML code laundering or not.
- bioemerl 4y agoI'm aware, that doesn't contradict what I just said at all.
- CRConrad 4y ago> If the code had a license that forbid reupload you could ask GitHub to remove it. Licenses don't need to forbid re-upload generally to be incompatible with GitHub. Given that uploading to GitHub, according to someone quoted on page 1 of this discussion, grants GitHub the right to use that code to "improve their service" (whatever that means -- maybe Copilot?), not explicitly granting that right to them, or the right for someone else to grant it to them, is enough to make them not allow uploading to GitHub. So that should be more like: "If the code had a license that didn't specifically allow Microsoft to use it to 'improve the GitHub service' you could order GitHub to remove it."