3 ms·
What is the argument here? You want us to use law theory from before the industrial revolution or something?
by jayd16 4y ago
What is the argument here? You want us to use law theory from before the industrial revolution or something?
- Red_Leaves_Flyy 4y agoLike the federalist hacks quoting 13th century jurisprudence??
- CrazyPyroLinux 4y agoSome sort of pesky "constitution...?"
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> What is the argument here? That limiting the administrative state is far from a monumental changing of the rules. Nobody is challenging the administrative state per se. The major doctrines principle is just being expanded, which limits Chevron, something that only came into being a few decades ago.
- _jal 4y agoThat's an OK summary of FedSoc talking points, but you're missing some of the barbs. Might want to try again. The effective reuslt of the non-delegation doctrine is that, when Republicans do not like a policy outcome, Congress is required to employ a time machine to give explicit instructions to an agency decades ahead of time.