That’s not false, but it really misses some important detail: namely, that generation shifting cannot be a “system of emission re- duction” under Section 111

That’s not false, but it really misses some important detail: namely, that generation shifting cannot be a “system of emission re- duction” under Section 111. 985 F. 3d 914, 995. In other words, telling a coal plant operator to reduce their plants emissions by switching some energy production to other sources is beyond the EPA’s legal authority. However, given that you evidently prefer a single (technocratic?) world government I suppose you might welcome the further erosion of the US republic? In that case damn-the-consequences-do-what-I-want is an understandable position to take, even if it’s inimical to the long term health of the republic.