4 ms·
I still don’t see why this is not a valid comparison. Sure, hardware is independent from software (more or less) but that doesn’t mean you can’t meaningfully co
by ugh 15y ago
I still don’t see why this is not a valid comparison. Sure, hardware is independent from software (more or less) but that doesn’t mean you can’t meaningfully compare the two.
- roflharrison 15y agoIt does mean you can't meaningfully compare the two. Are you saying that if people started installing Android onto iPhones (if it were possible) all of a sudden the hardware failure rates for iPhones would sky rocket?
- ugh 15y agoOf course not! Why would you think that? All this says is that devices running Android fail on average more often than iPhones – for whatever reason (regression to the mean, one designer and manufacturer vs many, lower priced devices, and so on). That’s a perfectly valid comparison.
- roflharrison 15y agoThe comparison is invalid because iPhone/Blackberry devices are premium high cost devices with high quality control. A direct comparison will only work against other premium high cost devices with high quality control. By comparing every Android phone on the market (from cheap to premium) to only premium devices you are always going to get a skewed result.
- ugh 15y agoI don’t understand. Why does that make the comparison invalid? That makes no sense at all. You are naming one factor that might explain the difference – but that is exactly the point of such comparisons! To figure out what the difference is!