YES To the extent that I need the functionality of any of those (and I don't have a use for all of them) then I would rather buy something that does one thing

YES To the extent that I need the functionality of any of those (and I don't have a use for all of them) then I would rather buy something that does one thing and one thing well rather than carrying something around with me that - can interrupt / distract me at any time - that is a single point of failure - that is expensive and a target for getting stolen - that spies on me - that enables the manufacturer to push updates to it remotely without my consent - and has planned obsolescence built in - seems to have enabled this mass migration to "software as a service" where I don't own my data or my software any more I've worked in tech for nearly 25 years. I used to be a very "high-tech" person, compared to my peers in the 90s and early 00s. These days my smart phone consists of a Pixel 6 with GrapheneOS installed, very few apps (the ones that are installed are open source) and I actually hardly touch the damned thing. I often forget it at home. And I like it that way. For those who make judicious use of their smart phone, great. Live and love your life. To each their own. What I resent about smart phones is that they left me and those like me behind. The above bullet points are all deal breakers for me. I don't like the things. I don't have a need for them. I want a smart phone free life and that seems to get harder and harder as everything, including some government services, are starting to require apps. I don't like to be a black and white thinker who thinks something is all good or all bad ... sure there are a couple of conveniences that I can point to with smart phones. But the bad so far outweighs the good to me that I'm practically a luddite now even though I've dedicated my life to developing technology.