4 ms·
The ergonomics of R are terrible compared to Mathematica. (My opinion, obviously.) In R, packages are developed by separate authors. Similar functions don't ha
by fn-mote 4y ago
The ergonomics of R are terrible compared to Mathematica. (My opinion, obviously.)
In R, packages are developed by separate authors. Similar functions don't have similar interfaces. There's no unity of style.
In Mathematica, much more careful thought was given to everything, including at a very basic level: names of functions.
Now I'm a big fan of the Tidyverse, and the fact that such a post-hoc language cleanup was possible (and done) is amazing... but the fact that it was necessary [1] is not.
[1] Really not intending flame-bait. This is an opinion that many people disagree with. Perhaps like systemd. It isn't the substance of this comment, it's just the context for my remarks.
- wiz21c 4y agoFor what I know of R (about 1.5 year full time with it; probabilities modelling/data analysis), I concur: the ecosystem is rich AND messy. I'm super impressed by the quality of everything, but it's often a "needle in a haystack" experience... Interstingly, I was a strong python pogrammer so I started to do my stuff with scipy and so on while cursing at R every 5 minutes. And after that year, tables have turned, I much prefer to work with R...