3 ms·
"Leaves out the fact that ..." she basically deserved it (or it was otherwise necessary)? That seems to be the innuendo you're making. Either way, I'd like to
by akhmatova 4y ago
"Leaves out the fact that ..." she basically deserved it (or it was otherwise necessary)?
That seems to be the innuendo you're making. Either way, I'd like to hear some substantiation as to this "significant pull factor", please.
- wbsss4412 4y ago> Either way, I'd like to hear some substantiation as to this "significant pull factor", please. > now she’s making way more money writing over at Substack. ^ > she basically deserved it (or it was otherwise necessary)? Deserved what? She quit.
- akhmatova 4y agoDeserved what? The bullying.
- wbsss4412 4y agoNever said she deserved to be bullied.
- akhmatova 4y agoI'll admit to being confused by your innuendo. But your post definitely seems to be trying to minimize the abuse she suffered at the NYT -- by implying that her departure was really all about the money. And in another post you basically discounted the abuse claims entirely, saying it was merely a "tense environment".
- wbsss4412 4y agoClearly we both take the seriousness of her claims differently, yes. I don’t doubt that it was an unpleasant environment for her to work in, I do not read it as though it was horribly abusive as you seem to though.
- sershe 4y agoSo, reading her description, you would think that let's say Fox News had a similar environment for e.g. a member of protected group, it would not be "horribly abusive", and if the company refused to punish it and the victim quit, we should discount their claims of abuse and look for alternative explanations of why they quit?