4 ms·
The wealth distributions are different. For example, minimum pay is higher in other western nations. The richest people are richer in the US but the poor people
by mbrodersen 4y ago
The wealth distributions are different. For example, minimum pay is higher in other western nations. The richest people are richer in the US but the poor people are poorer. So depending on how you cherry pick incomes/wealth you can show whatever you want. I personally care more about how a nation treats its poor than how wealthy the most wealthy people are. But YMMV of course.
- philwelch 4y agoIf you measure by median household income, the US is towards the top. So when you see a statistic that says more than 50% of US households live paycheck to paycheck, that’s a choice, because the median US household doesn’t have to live paycheck to paycheck.
- mbrodersen 4y agoYep its the same in other rich western countries. People spend more than they earn and have very little financial literacy. If they put 10% aside every month and invested wisely their long term financial situation would be dramatically better. But it requires longer term thinking. Not a common trait.
- mschuster91 4y ago> If they put 10% aside every month and invested wisely their long term financial situation would be dramatically better. To use a 200 year old quote: "They should eat cakes instead". Someone with absolutely no money to spare absolutely cannot set aside 10% of their income - and even if they manage to do so, it's all one healthcare or other emergency away from being wiped out.
- mbrodersen 4y agoThat’s obvious of course. If you have no money then you can’t invest for the future. However the majority of people living in rich western countries most definitely can put 10% or even 20% aside every month by lowering the living standards accordingly.
- philwelch 4y agoSomeone making the median household income in the US can absolutely afford to set aside 10% of their income.