You keep using strawman incorrectly in this thread. First off, that response was not refuting your main point, but a secondary point. (I'm really not sure what

You keep using strawman incorrectly in this thread. First off, that response was not refuting your main point, but a secondary point. (I'm really not sure what your main point was as you changed it from profiling pitbull owners to profiling dog owners after I pointed out the flaw in your logic) I was simply disputing your statement that dog owners would have also have a gun because gun owners own multiple guns. That's not sound logic. Your logic is jumping around and you don't have a cohesive point. Would you like to rephrase your main point so we can add straw back to the man?