It's ill-advised. We do this for repeat DUI offenders, but you need a car to get around most of America-- so even when suspended or unlicensed, people drive an

It's ill-advised. We do this for repeat DUI offenders, but you need a car to get around most of America-- so even when suspended or unlicensed, people drive anyway. At that that point they are both (a) uninsurable and (b) illegally operating, and now have more reasons to flee the scene of an accident than they do to remain. If it's some rich kid perpetrator, there won't even be a manslaughter charge if the victim dies. All arbitrary license revocation does is make the roads twice as dangerous for everyone else.