> Just using the company's own 2021 statistics, they had 6 million properties[2][3] . So they "suspended" .1% of their properties for being bad neighbors. Is th

> Just using the company's own 2021 statistics, they had 6 million properties[2][3] . So they "suspended" .1% of their properties for being bad neighbors. Is that an impressive figure? Further they suspended them for violating their policy nowhere does it what a suspension entails though. Was it a 24 hour suspension? A week? It says guests not hosts so they banned people renting AirBnB not people renting out AirBnBs.