4 ms·
> I mean, we have deliberately initiated containment failures for military purposes, so we know what they can look like. This is an empirical argument. Is the
by SlickNixon 4y ago
> I mean, we have deliberately initiated containment failures for military purposes, so we know what they can look like.
This is an empirical argument.
Is the upper bound of damage higher for nuclear reactors or fossil fuels?
- mikestew 4y agoMan, you've got more patience than I do for someone dancing around the question. Especially when the dancer thinks that the worst case for a modern nuclear plant is Hiroshima circa 1945, but won't actually come right out and say it (for reasons I suspect are obvious).
- SlickNixon 4y agoThey will post a source for the millions dead figure soon, I'm sure of it.