4 ms·
I mean, you can just refer to the Roe v. Wade judgement to understand the Supreme Court's view on why that is the case.
by matthewmacleod 4y ago
I mean, you can just refer to the Roe v. Wade judgement to understand the Supreme Court's view on why that is the case.
- charrondev 4y agoBut Roe v. Wade (and abortion being protected under a right to privacy) was changed
- matthewmacleod 4y agoRight, but the argument for why one would consider it to be protected is clearly spelled out in the original court case – regardless of any subsequent ruling.
- 99_00 4y agoAnd you can refer to Dobbs to understand the Supreme Court's view on why it isn't the case.
- matthewmacleod 4y agoYou asked why somebody would think that the right to privacy is applicable in this situation. There is ample material describing why they might think that, including a Supreme Court judgement. It's not a difficult position to understand, regardless of whether you believe that view or not. The existence of other material, including a later judgement, supporting the view that this isn't the case does not invalidate other views.