> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence Absence of effect is not absence of evidence. > maybe we are just not looking carefully at it. Or maybe the

> Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence Absence of effect is not absence of evidence. > maybe we are just not looking carefully at it. Or maybe the damage was yet done. That's a shifting of the burden of proof in an attempt to prop up a claim for which you not only have no evidence, you in fact have counter evidence.