3 ms·
I think simply seizing the vehicle would be sufficient. I’d be willing to bet most of the people doing this can’t easily afford another one. Taking someone’s t
by kayodelycaon 4y ago
I think simply seizing the vehicle would be sufficient. I’d be willing to bet most of the people doing this can’t easily afford another one.
Taking someone’s toy away hurts way more than a fine or suspension that can be ignored.
Edit: Also, if you just take the truck and issue a fine, it saves another person from needlessly being turned into a criminal.
- flatiron 4y agoNYC at least tried for a bit to seize drunk driver's cars but it was quickly thrown out in court.
- toss1 4y agoContrast that with civil asset forfeiture ,which still seems to be the law(lesness) of the land...
- throwaway0a5e 4y agoCivil asset forfeiture only continues to be legal because the enforcement agencies are smarter than to apply it with the same breadth they apply DUI law and whatnot.