3 ms·
Without being able to see their contracts, I would imagine Pike and Thompson have been around the block long enough to know that selling time isn't always the b
by randomdata 4y ago
Without being able to see their contracts, I would imagine Pike and Thompson have been around the block long enough to know that selling time isn't always the best option. They may put in eight hours of work (although I believe both are basically retired at this point), but if that's not what they are selling, the time spent is moot.
To illustrate further, as a farmer, I sell grain, not time. The job requires my time to be inputted, yes, but if I put in eight hours of work or two hours of work to produce the same amount of grain, I am getting paid the same either way. Developers can structure themselves similarly, which is to say selling something that is the product of time, not time itself, if they so choose.
The average developer, especially those on the lower end of the pay scale, however, most commonly chooses to sell their time and their time alone. And when you are selling hours just like everyone else, price is going to converge within a relatively narrow range. An hour is an hour is an hour so it is difficult to differentiate if one hour is more valuable than another or how that hour translates into the output, and so it is priced accordingly.
- danbruc 4y agoIf the market works, the price should go down approaching production costs, i.e. time invested. If you are able to charge more than that, there is some kind of market failure like a lack of competition.
- randomdata 4y agoThat's tech in a nutshell. Being a race to finding some kind of moat (intellectual property law, network effects, etc.) to prevent an efficient market from being established.