4 ms·
> should be compensated in proportion to the time This assumption doesn't always hold. Employee and employer might agree to share the value created which is n
by helge9210 4y ago
> should be compensated in proportion to the time
This assumption doesn't always hold.
Employee and employer might agree to share the value created which is not always a function of time spent working.
- danbruc 4y agoCan you give an example? I don't think this is impossible, but I can not immediately think of an example. And this probably heavily depends on what you mean with value created.
- helge9210 4y agoExample of compensation not tied to a time spent: a company might pay someone to do nothing, so this someone doesn't do something for a competitor. Value sharing is a basic framework for compensation negotiation. Employee wants to get all the value derived from own contribution. Employer wants to pay absolute minimum employee is willing to accept. Paying more than derived value doesn't make economic sense, so compromise will be somewhere within this range. If acceptable minimum is below the derived value, compromise is impossible. Time spent working is a free variable in all this.