4 ms·

Introducing JS.js

• rescdsk 15y ago
  Vapor.js is way better. I find JS.js far too intrusive. "Be awesome"? It's just that kind of thinking that keeps people from really getting things done.
  • atatiyan 15y ago
    I've looked at Vapor. To be honest, I found it to be without much substance.
    • vamsee 15y ago
      Oh, the lulz keep coming :)
• PedroCandeias 15y ago
  Nice joke. But do you really mean to critique the current state of JS library development? Why? Personally, I'm thankful for the bounty of useful libraries out there. Long may jackasses with keyboards [sic] keep shipping *.js.
  • atatiyan 15y ago
    Thanks Pedro. I definitely didn't mean this as a critique of JS library development. I'm actually very happy to see so many useful JavaScript libraries out there.
• arethuza 15y ago
  I actually learned something from reading the source code of JS.js: that there is such a thing as the European Union Public License: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Public_Licence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Public_Licence
  • atatiyan 15y ago
    I'm glad to be of service :)
• websymphony 15y ago
  Jokes Aside. Who doesn't really like these JS libraries? Are they making your life easier? Umm Yea. Did you have to spend the time re-inventing the wheel. Umm No. Why is he complaining then?
• joshmanders 15y ago
  /* DICKS.js */ D=8; if(8===D) { document.write('DICKS.js'); } You're welcome.