This argument is based on a logical fallacy equating "human" with "person". It's yet another example of an attempt to derail the discussion. >You may disagree

This argument is based on a logical fallacy equating "human" with "person". It's yet another example of an attempt to derail the discussion. >You may disagree with some of the premises but they follow one another You can say the exact same thing about antivaxers. >If you want to actually convince somebody in the future, saying their views are as irrational as believing the Earth is flat isn't the best way. Honestly, I don't think I can convince a flat-earther or pro-lifer. This kind of brainwashing appears to be unfixable. What can be done is limiting the spread.