The point is, as it didn't seem to get across in my previous comment, is that Bitcoin doesn't suffer (as much) from consideration B because any shady dealer can

The point is, as it didn't seem to get across in my previous comment, is that Bitcoin doesn't suffer (as much) from consideration B because any shady dealer can act as an "exchange", whereas traditional non-physical finance requires a chain of somewhat reputable institutions to be the middle person. You can't "fix" traditional finance system if the government of one party makes it illegal to do trades (unless you're thinking about plotting a revolution in another country).