5 ms·
Looks pretty straightforward. But why use this over, for example, crate? Also, how are you going to make revenue out of it? S3 does cost money. #edit: Almost f
by PedroCandeias 15y ago
Looks pretty straightforward. But why use this over, for example, crate? Also, how are you going to make revenue out of it? S3 does cost money.
#edit:
Almost forgot. Well done on the UI front. Minor gripe: an actual button to select the file to upload would be nice. Having to launch Finder and browsing to the file I'm looking for, then dragging it back to the browser, can take much longer than just clicking a button, browsing and clicking "open".
- JohnTitus 15y agoAgree on the select button. Drag and drop is neat, but is usually annoying when my browser is full screen.
- warp 15y agoDrag & drop doesn't seem to work for me (Debian GNU/Linux, dragging from Thunar file manager to firefox). So I second the request for a file select button.
- p4bl0 15y agoI second the seconding. I couldn't try the service because I don't even have a graphical file manager installed so I couldn't even try to drag'n'drop from anywhere. Then again, I'm not likely to really use this kind of services either since I have my own server which I can scp files to.
- chrisledet 15y agoThanks for the feedback. We'll certainly add a classic upload page. Also, we plan to have freemium model soon. We also have a Mac & Linux client in the works - just need to find the time!
- merlincorey 15y agoAlright but what if I'm on BSD and I have a keyboard driven window manager without a mouse? What I mean to say is, the class upload page is probably more important early on than individual OS clients. I really do like the design and concept, though.