2 ms·

> Nobody knows for sure how the chips will fall We pretty much do know how things will work out, actually. That's why people made these laws. The laws were ma

by stale2002 4y ago

> Nobody knows for sure how the chips will fall We pretty much do know how things will work out, actually. That's why people made these laws. The laws were made to force Apple, and similar, to open up their app stores. And if Apple doesn't follow the law, then they will be fined billions of dollars. Because that's why they made these laws in the first place. You saying that people don't know, is cope on your part, because you can't handled that Apple lost, and cannot win against governments.

simondotau 4y ago
Cope? Seriously? I’m trying to have a considered conversation, I’m not interested in engaging you in an irrelevant battle of Twitter-derived smack talk. I’ll say again, your version of future events doesn’t even align with mainstream analysis of the DMA.
- stale2002 4y ago
  Yes basically it is cope. Law makers created these laws, specifically for the purpose of opening up these app stores, among other things. And then you are saying that actually the law won't do what it is directly intending on doing. The point of all of these laws are to open up these app stores. That is the direct goal. And clever attempts to get around them, will result in billions of dollars in fines to Apple. I am happy to come back to your posts, months later when the laws are in effect, and make fun of you for being wrong on that though. Really, I am more of a "I told you so" kind of person, though. Because when I come back, and say "I told you so", you won't be able to make any cope/reaching/bad counterarguments. You'll know, definitively, that you were wrong, and you won't be able to hide from that. These are falsifiable claims about how things will turn out. And since they are falsifiable, I can make fun of someone, when the statements are falsified, and the laws are in effect. And there will be no hiding from how bad your predictions were, when I can show it to your face, when it happens.
  - simondotau 4y ago
    When someone writes a law saying that Apple is required to give their intellectual property away for free and forcefully open the floodgates of third party app stores, and this law passes, and this law survives challenge in the relevant court, then you'll be entitled to be that "I told you so" kind of person. Happy to wait. In the meantime it seems you're operating under a misapprehension that any of that has occurred when in fact none of that has. Even the most optimistic reading of DMA doesn't support your fan fiction.
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]

simondotau 4y ago

Cope? Seriously? I’m trying to have a considered conversation, I’m not interested in engaging you in an irrelevant battle of Twitter-derived smack talk. I’ll say again, your version of future events doesn’t even align with mainstream analysis of the DMA.

stale2002 4y ago
Yes basically it is cope. Law makers created these laws, specifically for the purpose of opening up these app stores, among other things. And then you are saying that actually the law won't do what it is directly intending on doing. The point of all of these laws are to open up these app stores. That is the direct goal. And clever attempts to get around them, will result in billions of dollars in fines to Apple. I am happy to come back to your posts, months later when the laws are in effect, and make fun of you for being wrong on that though. Really, I am more of a "I told you so" kind of person, though. Because when I come back, and say "I told you so", you won't be able to make any cope/reaching/bad counterarguments. You'll know, definitively, that you were wrong, and you won't be able to hide from that. These are falsifiable claims about how things will turn out. And since they are falsifiable, I can make fun of someone, when the statements are falsified, and the laws are in effect. And there will be no hiding from how bad your predictions were, when I can show it to your face, when it happens.
- simondotau 4y ago
  When someone writes a law saying that Apple is required to give their intellectual property away for free and forcefully open the floodgates of third party app stores, and this law passes, and this law survives challenge in the relevant court, then you'll be entitled to be that "I told you so" kind of person. Happy to wait. In the meantime it seems you're operating under a misapprehension that any of that has occurred when in fact none of that has. Even the most optimistic reading of DMA doesn't support your fan fiction.
  - deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]