3 ms·
"What changed? The most compelling theory holds that a mixture of rapid inflation and generous federal-tax policy encouraged homeowners to treat their house as
by johnthuss 4y ago
"What changed? The most compelling theory holds that a mixture of rapid inflation and generous federal-tax policy encouraged homeowners to treat their house as an investment, providing a strong incentive to oppose new construction."
This is the reason existing home-owners oppose building apartments and townhouses nearby. High-density housing lowers the value of their home, which costs them money. It also tends to increase crime rates. It's difficult to persuade a home-owner that they should give up some of their home's value just so that others can benefit from a larger supply of affordable housing. What does the homeowner have to gain other than thanks?
- zach_garwood 4y ago> What does the homeowner have to gain other than thanks? A functioning market?
- dreamdeath 4y agoIs there strong evidence available that increased density negatively affects nearby housing prices? In my experience density can lead to a place being more desirable (by virtue of hosting more highly desirable amenities) so while I can imagine the correlation suggested, I can also imagine the opposite being true.