3 ms·
The problems with snaps are in the execution. The startup times are ridiculously slow (multiple seconds or even worse) at least on some machines (I've only eve
by Tainnor 4y ago
The problems with snaps are in the execution.
The startup times are ridiculously slow (multiple seconds or even worse) at least on some machines (I've only ever experienced them to be sluggish, but some people say the opposite, so...) and this is particularly egregious for e.g. firefox or a password manager (bitwarden).
Because I just couldn't bear it anymore I uninstalled the firefox snap and installed the flatpak instead. Flatpak solves similar problems, but doesn't seem to be as sluggish, at least for the applications I've used.
- oldjavacoder 4y agoAlso multiple gigabytes of space in /snap and not knowing when or why an app is updating or what it will do to the machine.
- quotemstr 4y ago> The startup times are ridiculously slow (multiple seconds or even worse) at least on some machines I agree that the implementation could be much improved. In particular, I'd like to see a switch to EROFS images.