4 ms·
I believe most projects that serve debs from their own download page do not try to package for each distro separately, and instead opt to package up requirement
by rtpg 4y ago
I believe most projects that serve debs from their own download page do not try to package for each distro separately, and instead opt to package up requirements as needed.
I can't comment deeply on deb vs rpm, it is kinda disappointing that we have this split, and I don't know if there's a great way to merge it back.
Mac does have a good distribution story. This also exists on Linux in the form of app images. The one missing piece is that Mac has the Applications convention. AppImageLauncher[0] solves this, but really it would be good for Gnome/KDE to just integrate this concept. That gives the (important!) "have the application show up in the application launcher" option.
I do not believe one could qualify Windows programs as being distributed as a single binary. A single installer, perhaps! But many Windows programs dump files all over your file tree to do things, and then goes to touch stuff in your registry. There's a reason we have "portable executables" for windows as its own download option!
[0]: https://github.com/TheAssassin/AppImageLauncher https://github.com/TheAssassin/AppImageLauncher