4 ms·
Unenforceable without a registry of some sort. You'd never know if a check was ran for that firearm or not.
by notch656a 4y ago
Unenforceable without a registry of some sort. You'd never know if a check was ran for that firearm or not.
- laverya 4y agoAnd indeed, it's when you mention the fact that UBCs require a gun registry to be enforceable that people really start opposing them. (The current background check system was passed with the compromise that it wouldn't be used to make a gun registry though the ATF, and in fact the ATF was not allowed to digitize records for exactly this reason. The ATF appears to have begun ignoring this deal in recent years, though)
- giantg2 4y agoThe ATF keeps the GAO quite busy. It's too bad the GAO has no real power on this and many other issues.
- pseudo0 4y agoThis is a solved problem with modern cryptography. Governments just don't want to implement a cryptographic scheme like this, given the side-benefits of a registry for future confiscation, red-flagging, etc.