3 ms·
I think it's a weapon (projected radio, radar interference, etc.) rather than a tool for spying.
by lizardactivist 4y ago
I think it's a weapon (projected radio, radar interference, etc.) rather than a tool for spying.
- adhesive_wombat 4y agoCertainly not optical spying, it's not big enough because of diffraction limits. The old NRO telescopes are basically Hubbles that point down, so they have a mirror about 2 metres across and probably a resolution somewhat better than Hubble (30cm on the surface). They even donated the chassis of some[1] to NASA once they were thoroughly obsolete. Imagine what the new ones can do if a Hubble-alike was such old hat it didn't even need to be secret. Also imagine if we'd been able to put a fleet of Hubbles out there rather than just one! [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_National_Reconnaissance_Office_space_telescope_donation_to_NASA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_National_Reconnaissance_O...