3 ms·
While a funny joke, the point isn't really applicable here. Parent poster, as I understood their comment, wasn't asserting that electronic voter machines are i
by ziddoap 4y ago
While a funny joke, the point isn't really applicable here.
Parent poster, as I understood their comment, wasn't asserting that electronic voter machines are impossible to defraud. They were pointing out that you cannot reasonably make a comparison between elections 70 years apart because way too much has changed (one large change being electronic voting machines) for them to be comparable anymore.
- pessimizer 4y agoThe passage of time isn't an argument. If the only things cited are voting machines, then voting machines are immediately conceded as untrustworthy, no argument has been made.
- skybrian 4y agoYes, it wasn't a full-fledged argument, more of a sketch. But assuming that how elections happen doesn't change over the years doesn't seem like a great default either?