3 ms·
I haven't lost track of anything. You asked a question and I replied to that. As far as your rhetorical device, I'm sorry but theft isn't the only way firearms
by falcrist 4y ago
I haven't lost track of anything. You asked a question and I replied to that.
As far as your rhetorical device, I'm sorry but theft isn't the only way firearms get into that market.
You're trying to attribute arguments to me that I never made, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop.
Thanks.
- mulmen 4y ago> You're trying to attribute arguments to me that I never made, and I'd appreciate it if you'd stop. I explicitly did the exact opposite of that. You are clearly confused but at this point I don’t think I can help you.
- falcrist 4y agoNo. You did exactly that. I'm asking you politely to please stop that and the condescension. It's ineffective and rude.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- mulmen 4y agoYou’re clearly still confused and I think that’s why you are being defensive. I replied to sha256sum’s (not you!) comment at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31912312 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31912312 with a rhetorical question. You then answered it as if it were an actual question. Since that wasn’t the reason for the question I then explained my interpretation of the original post (that again, you did not make). Since that point you seem to believe I claimed sha256sum’s post was yours but in fact I did no such thing and actually disclaimed it specifically.
- falcrist 4y agoNo. I'm clearly not confused. I know who you replied to. I'm not responding to them. I'm tired of the disingenuous way you've approached this conversation, and your awful attitude. As I said in my last comment, you need to cut it out.