3 ms·
I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online. It's too conveniently timed--and too specific in content--to be coincidence. They didn't leak a l
by jstarfish 4y ago
I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online.
It's too conveniently timed--and too specific in content--to be coincidence. They didn't leak a list of everybody on food stamps during a slow news cycle.
Everything other states have threatened to do regarding abortion, California has responded to by doing the exact same thing, only replacing the word "abortion" with "guns."
- peter422 4y agoCalifornia has banned all guns? Some states have actually banned all abortions so it seems like you should be able to point to a single statewide official suggesting all guns be banned. Otherwise you might be guilty of exaggerating just a bit.
- Rebelgecko 4y agoAB 2847 is a clear attempt at a handgun ban (requiring California to ban 3 handguns for every new one- that's not a sustainable process). California also copied the Texas law about suing abortion providers, except for manufacturer's of gun parts (although that one hasn't gone into effect yet)
- phlofy 4y ago> I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online. Should've been the end of it. Why do you ho on to argue why you think it's true?
- mulmen 4y ago> I'm not afraid to make it; there's no burden of proof online. That is a disappointing disregard for modern public discourse. You may well have something interesting to say. Alas, we will never know.