4 ms·
The deepfakes and stolen PII discussed in the article are for identity theft: The candidate steals the identity of someone with an impressive LinkedIn backgroun
by PragmaticPulp 4y ago
The deepfakes and stolen PII discussed in the article are for identity theft: The candidate steals the identity of someone with an impressive LinkedIn background and then presumably hopes that the company takes their background at face value and doesn't ask too many hard questions in the interview. The company then completes reference and background checks on the victim. They might also use this identity theft to qualify for jobs that aren't available in their location due to contractual and/or legal restrictions.
The "overemployed" people generally aren't performing identity theft like this. Having multiple jobs ranges anywhere from legal to fraud depending on contracts they've signed or how they've misrepresented themselves (it's not uncommon to see suggestions to take multiple hourly jobs and then exaggerate the number of hours worked, for example). However, adding identity theft on top would elevate what they're doing to a major crime, which is not something that would help them.
- foobar2021 4y agoIt’s not legal for some people to hold multiple jobs because of visa restrictions. So that could be a motivation for the added risk.
- ClumsyPilot 4y agothat's too small a subset people - you should be looking at it from the angle of 'what are crimi at businesses doing at scale for profit"
- hnlmorg 4y ago"remote" doesn't have to mean "foreign". It just means your daily "physical office" isn't company premises.
- foobar2021 4y agoI’m referring to people living in the USA on a visa who can only hold a single job at a time.
- hnlmorg 4y agoYeah I got that. My point is there are plenty of people living in USA who are US citizens and who might also be tempted to pull this kind of scam (for want a better term).